the Great Mystery

 With these two earthworks we are confronted with a great mystery. Why would ancient cultures create such laborious effigies, and after such an arduous task, what purpose/benefit would they serve? These types of earthworks are found throughout the ancient world and are an impressive display of energy. One day we may have the answers, but for now we can only theorize. 

The top image is an aerial photo of the Nazca hummingbird geoglyph located in the Southern desert of Peru. The lines were made by removing stones to reveal lighter colored rocks underneath. The darker stones were then placed along the borders forming an outline around the newly unearthed stones. Recovered wooden stakes at the site point to the theory that the lines would have been mapped out by stretching cords between the stakes to guide the workers along. They possibly used gridded drawings or textiles that they simply enlarged through the staking method. This massive undertaking would surely have had a purpose. One of the strongest theories point to the desert terrain and the peoples need for water. Could these be an ancient irrigation system? (1)

Even less is known about the origins and dates of the Great Serpent Mound shown in the bottom image. This earthwork is located in southwestern Ohio and there is a heated debate about when it was made. Like the Nazca hummingbird geoglyph it is massive in size. The Mound measures 1,300 feet in length and  one to  three feet in height. It is also an effigy, or representative of an animal, like the Nazca hummingbird. The intention here points to a celestial hypothesis rather than an earthly one, but like the Nasca Lines it may be a mapping technique. (2)

Notable similarities in the earthworks are the adaptation of important animal figures. Indigenous peoples had strong beliefs surrounding the spiritual power of the animals they encountered. It is possible that the Nasca was using tropical animals to signify a water source while the Serpent Mound may have been attributing the supernatural power of the serpent to their map of the stars. Obviously, they are both massive and can only truly be appreciated from an aerial vantage point. The mystery remains as to why ancient cultures would put so much effort into creating these immense geological artworks.

    Notes:

    1. Yantz, Jayne, "Nasca Geoglyphs," Smart History, accessed November 21, 2020, https://smarthistory.org/nasca-geoglyphs/.

    2. Brown, Katherine T., "Fort Ancient Culture: Great Serpent Mound," Khan Academy, accessed November 21, 2020, https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/indigenous-americas-apah/north-america-apah/a/fort-ancient-culture-great-serpent-mound.

    

Sacrifice in Stone

 

Yaxchilan lintel 24

Yaxchilan lintel 24 detail

In the classic Maya city of Yaxchilan, present day Chiapas, Mexico, we are going to examine a limestone  carving featuring a bloodletting ritual. These carvings were done on lintels, or load bearing stones fitted above doorways where the viewer would have had to have been looking up in order to see them. Bloodletting was a common practice for the Maya people and was viewed as a sort of rebirth. It was especially important to the ruling class due the power of royal blood. According to Maya belief, when a member of the royal family shed blood it opened up a portal for ancestral spirits to pass.(1)

 In this scene we are observing Lady K'abal Xook, the wife of Shield Jaguar the Great, perform an auto sacrifice by pulling a barbed rope through her tongue while the blood dripped into a basket full of paper bark. Shield Jaguar the Great, the ruler, stands above his wife holding a torch, suggesting that the ritual was done in a dark place. The glyphs above the figures and to the left tell us not only who the figures are, but also the name of the city and the date in which the ritual took place. We can still see a little bit of pigment on the panel suggesting it was once brightly colored.(2)The attire of the two subjects in this panel is quite elaborate with the queen wearing an intricately woven huipil and the king donning a battle trophy in the form of a shrunken head. The females headdress is quite elaborate and large and it looks like her dress has some sort of frog pattern woven into it. There is so much intricate detail to the sculpture that you can even see some blood scrolls on her face.

Yaxchilan was an important Maya city near the banks of the Usumacinta River. It was a center of power that reached its peak in the Late Classical period of 800 to 1000 C.E. These ruins are significant to the archeological record due to the descriptive hieroglyphic text explaining the dynastic history of the city. (3)

 

    Notes

    1. "Art Through Time: A Global View," Annenberg Learner, accessed November 19, 2020, https://www.learner.org/series/art-through-time-a-global-view/dreams-and-visions/lintel-25-of-yaxchilan-structure-23/

    2. Maestri, Nicoletta, "Yaxchilan - Classic Maya City-State in Mexico, Thought Co, March 18, 2017, accessed November 19, 2020, https://www.thoughtco.com/yaxchilan-mexico-maya-center-173249.

    3. "Yaxchilan Ruins, Ancient Mayan Site in Mexico," Maya-Ruins, accessed Novermer 20, 2020, http://www.mayan-ruins.org/yaxchilan/.

Beautiful Heads

Over the course of the semester we have learned about many different cultures from ancient times up until around the 1500s. I have been hesitant to write comparison papers mostly because the prompts feature two different geographical places with sometimes vastly different religious/philosophical evolutions. In an effort to lend my own voice to this week's paper I am accepting the challenge of writing and exploring two cultures, and their artifacts, that are oceans apart. I hope that anyone commenting on this paper can lend some good advice for the future.

before 900 B.C.E Olmec

12-14th C. Yoruba (Ife)

When exploring the Yoruba and Olmec cultures the similarities in abstraction and stylization of an idealized ruling class are defined within their artifacts. Contextually, we lack information on both the Colossal Heads of the Olmec and the Yoruba Heads of the Ife in order to draw decisive conclusions about their purpose. For this reason, I am going to focus more on the materials and appearance and less on the reason the artifacts were made. However it is important to entertain at least one theory about who the heads represent in order to make sense of the comparison. 

The creation of the Colossal Heads, standing nearly ten feet in height, would have been a laborious undertaking. The giant blocks of stone were sometimes mined as far away as 50 miles. Without machinery it would have been somewhat of a logistical nightmare, and once the stone was successfully in place the artist would have done the carving with crude tools also made of stone. The sheer size and difficulty of these sculptures point to the theory that they depict important people. It is likely that they represented rulers or someone in power. (1) 

While the Colossal Heads were made from large basalt stone boulders the Ife heads were created from either terra-cotta or metal.  The size is quite small, measured in centimeters, compared to the Olmec heads, measured in feet. What has been uncovered so far in Nigeria, represents many different aspects of the Ife life from the ruling class to the civilian class. One could say that they are a stylized representation of beauty, but then we find sculptures that are oddly misshapen and deformed as well. Again, we find ourselves in a position of not having enough information to draw decisive conclusions . One thing scholars believe to be true is that the more naturalistic looking heads are probably idealized portraits of the ruling class. (2)

I think it is important to note that there are some visual similarities between these artifacts. In both examples we see an exaggeration of features. The faces are abstracted particularly in the eyes and mouths. In the Yoruba we have the upturned almond shaped eyes while the Olmec has the downturned almond shaped eyes. Both cultures have chosen to represent the person wearing some form of stylized headdress that is representative of the culture. The Yoruba head is bearing the marks of scarification while the Olmec head is mostly free of marks. Perhaps we are getting a glimpse of what each of these cultures found appealing in the people that ruled them. What is most striking to me is that both of these artifacts are unable to tell their full story, but still somehow manage to elicit the idea that they are important and beautiful.

    Notes    

    1. Minister, Christopher, "The Colossal Heads of the Olmec," ThoughtCo, January 25, 2019, accessed     November 12, 2020, https://www.thoughtco.com/the-colossal-heads-of-the-olmec-2136318.

    2. Kaufman, Jason Edward, "The sculpture of Ife changes ideas about African art," The Washington Post, March 9, 2011, accessed November 12, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-art-of-ife-changes-ideas-about-african-art/2011/03/08/ABbz8fP_story.html.

    

Fang Nigil Mask

 

A Fang Ngil Mask, Gabon

This 60cm ceremonial Ngil mask is an example of those worn by the Fang people of Gabon. These wooden artworks were sought after by collectors in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. These pieces were so unique that there are only about a dozen left in existence. The piece above is being auctioned for just under 2.5 million Euros which blew my mind. It also brings up the question as to how a private collector can own something that is so rare?(1)

The popularity of these masks in the early twentieth century meant that famous artists, such as Picasso and Derain, were able to view and draw inspiration from them while they visited Paris. The avant-garde movement also found inspiration in these masks and similarities can be found in depictions by Italian artist Modigliani. (1)

The ceremonial dance accompanying these mask wearers was meant to inspire fear in those with bad intentions by mimicking evil entities. (1) Imagine sitting on your porch late at night and these dancers come through illuminating themselves in flickering torchlight. The white mask would have stood out in stark contrast to the darkness while the dancers shook it around while probably making terrifying sounds. 

The Ngil played a judicial role of peacekeeper and witch-hunter within the Fang tribes. These masks were thought to have been used by a secret male society within the culture. There is little information on exactly what they were up to, but they were supposedly used in a supernatural dance to persecute evil-doers as well as during initiation ceremonies.. The features in the masks were meant to look abnormal and exaggerated in order to strike fear into the heart of the evil force. The same can be said for the color white that is used on  the masks.(2) The dance must have been the more frightening part of the ritual because the mask seems to have a peaceful countenance. I wonder if it's supposed to represent a dead ancestor or something of the like? 

The linear quality of the nose and heart shaped outline of the face creates a stunning sense of balance through symmetry. There even seems to be a sort of stylistic hair piece above the forehead. It's quite remarkable how the elongation of the jaw works rhythmically with the nose and small features of the mouth and eyes. The eyes are interesting in that they are just little dash marks which make it seem to be asleep. This is where I get my theory of dead ancestors because white represents the dead and the facial expression is so serene and peaceful it appears to be dead. It's just a guess, but I honestly don't find the mask to be scary on its own. Maybe if it was animated by a dancer and torchlight it would be more fearsome. 

    Notes

    1. Claessens, Bruno, "5 minutes with...A Fang Ngil mask from Gabon," Christies, accessed November 6, 2020, https://www.christies.com/features/5-Minutes-with-A-rare-Fang-Ngil-mask-9446-1.aspx.

    2."Fang Ngil Mask," Art Tribal, accessed November 6, 2020, https://arttribal.com/products/fang-ngil-mask-1.

Nok Terracottas

Map of Region

 

Nok Art: Early Sculptural Pottery

Nok Art: Early Sculptural Pottery

What we know about Nok civilization is that it was around from about 1500 BCE to 200 CE.  We don't fully know what kind of political structure they had, but we can conclude that the terracottas are a clue as to the lasting stability of the civilization. (1)As we have seen these last couple of weeks, there is very  little information on this culture, therefore we can conclude little about what the people were like. We will instead focus on what these terracottas mean in context to other artifacts that have been found in the area and what these things may tell us.

The absence of stone buildings and structures point to the idea that the people of Nok were building with wood or other natural materials. The findings of pottery and certain animal bones tell us that they were probably cultivating crops alongside the domestication of livestock. These sculptures put forth the question of whether they were participating in trade or not. It is most likely that they were since there were quite a few of these sculptures unearthed, but that does not mean they were not religious or just artistic objects.(1)We simply do not have sufficient evidence to explain their purpose.

These little sculptural pieces were made from rolled coils and sculpted subtractively. This technique is a clue to their society having developed alongside a wood carving tradition since clay is usually sculpted additively. What is most notable in these sculptures is that the head is proportionately larger than the body. Contextually, we gather from nearby cultures,  they may have believed the head was the center of the intellect. The Nok heads all have different features pointing to individual sculpting rather than molding. The hair and jewelry are formed stylistically and elaborately which would have represented the individuals status or stage in life most likely. (2)

I love the abstract quality of the Nok terracottas. I have noticed that many of the ancient civilizations we have studied have this commonality of cubism or expressive minimalism. The cave paintings are a wonderful example of this expressive yet minimalistic approach to representing an animal or person without going into a lot of detail. I think about some of Picasso's later paintings and it looks like his inspiration was ancient cave paintings. It is curious how styles trend throughout time as our definition of what makes great art fluctuates through the ages. 

    Notes

    1. Nok Civilization, Think Africa, accessed November 6, 2020, https://thinkafrica.net/nok-civilization/.

    2. "Nok Terracottas (500 B.C-200 A.D.)," Department of the Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas, Metropolitan Museum of Art, October 2000, accessed November 6, 2020, https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/nok/hd_nok.htm.